Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of G.S.P.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 25, 2000No. C7-99-1028PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DORIS OHLSEN HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant, a juvenile, alleges that the trial court erred in refusing to suppress statements made by appellant and in determining that the state had proven appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We conclude that appellant’s - statements were inadmissible because they were taken in violation of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, and we reverse.
FACTS
On the second day of the school year in September 1998,12-year-old G.S.P., a seventh grader at North Middle School in Grand Rapids, apparently forgot his backpack in the locker room after a football game.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re I.J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re the Welfare of T.J.C.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Kalmakoff v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Kalmakoff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009
- In Re the Welfare of R.J.E.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.