Legal Opinion
In re I.J.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 13, 2005No. 03-FS-671PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
Appellee was charged as a juvenile with possession of marijuana. Following an ev-identiary hearing, certain statements made by appellee were suppressed after the trial judge found that appellee who had not been given Miranda warnings,1 was in custody when questioned by the police. The judge dismissed the charge pending against appellee, and the government appealed the judge’s suppression order. We agree that appellee was in custody when he was interrogated without benefit of the required Miranda warnings, and affirm the trial judge’s dismissal.
I
Motion to Suppress
On March…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Jamel Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Graham v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Green v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.