Kalmakoff v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
Byron M. Kalmakoff was convicted of raping and murdering a young woman in Pilot Point. At his trial, the State relied on statements that Kalmakoff made to the state troopers who came to Pilot Point to investigate the homicide. In this appeal, Kalmakoff argues that the statements introduced at his trial were the tainted fruit of violations of Kalmakoff's Miranda rights. 2 For the reasons explained here, we conclude that even though the troopers may have violated Kal-makoff's Miranda rights, the major portion of the challenged evidence was not tainted by these Miranda…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kalmakoff v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
- Kalmakoff v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Rockwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009