Legal Opinion

Kalmakoff v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided January 16, 2009No. A-9700, 3NA-03-086 CrPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Byron M. Kalmakoff was convicted of raping and murdering a young woman in Pilot Point. At his trial, the State relied on statements that Kalmakoff made to the state troopers who came to Pilot Point to investigate the homicide. In this appeal, Kalmakoff argues that the statements introduced at his trial were the tainted fruit of violations of Kalmakoff's Miranda rights. 2 For the reasons explained here, we conclude that even though the troopers may have violated Kal-makoff's Miranda rights, the major portion of the challenged evidence was not tainted by these Miranda…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kalmakoff v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
  3. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
  4. Kalmakoff v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Rockwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API