Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of T.J.C.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 3, 2003No. C3-02-1622PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
Following a bench trial, appellant was adjudicated delinquent for commission of criminal sexual conduct in the second degree. Appellant challenges his adjudication, claiming that his statement, taken while he was in custody, was erroneously admitted at trial, and there was insufficient evidence to support his adjudication. Although we conclude that appellant was in custody and should have been informed of his constitutional rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), we conclude that even without appellant’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. JuarezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re I.J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Kalmakoff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009
- In Re IJDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In re I.J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re IJDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.