Legal Opinion

Minnesota v. Murphy

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 22, 1984No. 82-827PublishedCited by 1,340 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

In this case, respondent Murphy, who was on probation, made incriminating admissions during a meeting with his probation officer. The issue before us is whether the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments prohibit the introduction into evidence of the admissions in Murphy’s subsequent criminal prosecution.

I

In 1974, Marshall Murphy was twice questioned by Minneapolis police concerning the rape and murder of a teenage girl. No charges were-then brought. In 1980, in connection with a prosecution for criminal sexual conduct arising out of an unrelated incident, Murphy pleaded guilty to a reduced charge…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,340 opinions

  1. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. McKune v. LileSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

1,335 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API