Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of R.J.E.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 11, 2001No. C4-00-2189PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge
R.J.E. appeals from adjudication of delinquency based on the district court’s finding that he committed criminal sexual conduct in the fifth degree. R.J.E. argues that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress a statement that was taken from him by a police officer at his school in violation of his Miranda rights, and that without the statement, there is insufficient evidence to support a finding that he committed the offense. The matter was tried on stipulated facts consisting of pertinent police reports, including the statement of the victim,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Welfare of R.J.E.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- In Re the Welfare of T.J.C.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- In Re RJESupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002