Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Keohane

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 29, 1995No. 94-6615PublishedCited by 1,485 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg

During a two-hour, tape-recorded session at Alaska state trooper headquarters, petitioner Carl Thompson confessed that he killed his former wife. Thompson’s confession was placed in evidence at the ensuing Alaska state-court trial, *102and he was convicted of first-degree murder. Challenging his conviction in a federal habeas corpus proceeding, Thompson maintained that the Alaska troopers gained his confession without according him the warnings Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966), requires: that he could remain silent; that anything he said could be used against him in court; and that he was…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,485 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Beverly A. Seymour v. Diane Walker,respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

1,480 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API