Legal Opinion

Fifield Manor v. Finston

California Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1960No. L. A. 25858PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the cost of essential medical care rendered by it to George A. Boss, deceased, pursuant to a “life-care contract.” Boss’ injuries and death resulted from an automobile accident allegedly caused by defendants’ negligence. A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend. From the judgment of dismissal accordingly entered, plaintiff appeals.

The essential allegations of plaintiff’s complaint, accepted as true for purposes of this appeal (Terry v. Bender, 143 Cal. App.2d 198, 201 [300 P.2d 119]), show the following situation:…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Walling v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. LiMandri v. JudkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. J'Aire Corp. v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Offshore Rental Co. v. Continental Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1978

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API