Legal Opinion

United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 16, 1950No. 35PublishedCited by 564 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Vinson

These cases, here on certiorari, present this important question under the Federal Tort Claims Act: May an insurance company bring suit in its own name against the United States upon a claim to which it has become subrogated by payment to an insured who would have been able to bring such an action? That question, in turn, requires our consideration of R. S. 3477, the “anti-assignment” statute.

Three cases, each presenting a slightly different aspect of the problem, were heard by the Court. In No. 35, the complaint alleges that an employee of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York was injured as…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Hobbs v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Martin v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by564 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Segal v. RochelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Rayonier Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

559 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API