Bradley v. Rosenthal
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County and from an order refusing a new trial. W. B. Wallace, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff sued to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him. In his complaint he set forth that he was employed by the defendants to aid in the construction of a telephone line; that his employment consisted in helping to set up and erect poles and place, thereon wires and other necessary appliances; that the defendants agreed to furnish suitable and proper poles; “that said defendants carelessly, negligently and with want of ordinary care on their part, furnished certain poles which were very brittle and unfit for said purposes, and the fact of the unfitness of such poles was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. JopesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Emery v. FowlerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1855
- Featherson v. President of Newburgh & Cocheton Turnpike Co.New York Supreme Court · 1893
- Culmer v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Fifield Manor v. FinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Cahill Bros., Inc. v. Clementina Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Popejoy v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.