Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School District
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
— This action for damages was brought by plaintiff, superintendent of defendant school district, against the district, three trustees, the county superintendent of schools and the district attorney. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend, and plaintiff has appealed from the ensuing judgment.
The Gompladnt Against the School District
It is alleged in substance against the district that the three trustees, constituting a majority of the board and acting within the scope of their official duties, maliciously engaged in a course of conduct for the purpose of discrediting…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Coverstone v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by168 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River Cty.Supreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.