Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1976No. 48001PublishedCited by 144 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION

The first amended complaint for negligence alleges "That plaintiff is the owner of the claim [legal malpractice] against defendants herein by virtue of a written assignment by Eleanor Rae Katz, dated August 7, 1972"; that defendants are attorneys at law and represented Eleanor Katz in a dissolution of marriage proceeding during the course of which they were negligent in advising her that they did not have to keep in their possession certain original…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Reichert v. General Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by144 opinions

  1. Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Picadilly, Inc. v. RaikosIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Smiley v. CitibankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Hedlund Manufacturing Co. v. Weiser, Stapler & SpivakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Brown v. City And County OfCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API