Legal Opinion

Dufton v. Daniels

California Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1923No. S. F. No. 10418PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the state board of control to audit and allow petitioner’s claim for his necessary traveling expenses as a state agent in returning to the state of California a fugitive-from justice, under the provisions of section 1557 of the Penal Code. The admitted facts are that one Newell, a fugitive from justice under a charge in Alameda County of a violation of section 476a of the Penal Code, was arrested in the state of New York. Thereupon the Governor of California issued a demand for his extradition and appointed petitioner a state agent for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  2. Wood v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Inglin v. HoppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Chapman v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Babcock v. GoodrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Bank of Italy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Modern Barber Colleges, Inc. v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Pacific Palisades Ass'n v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. City of National City v. FritzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Marrujo v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API