Legal Opinion

Ivens v. Simon

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1963No. Civ. 7005PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment after order sustaining a general demurrer without leave to amend.

The plaintiff, who is the appellant herein, by a first amended complaint as to a third cause of action against the City of Fontana and its council, the defendants and respondents herein, alleged: That, in 1954, the defendants employed Kroeger Associates to propose a classification and pay plan for the city’s employees; that, pursuant thereto, Kroeger Associates presented its recommendation in the premises through a document entitled “Position Classification Plan”; that, as a part thereof, under…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Tevis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Alford v. PiernoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Zidell v. BrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Stanley v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. People Ex Rel. Riles v. Windsor Univ., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API