County of Sacramento v. Hickman
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.
This is an original petition for writ of mandate filed by the County of Sacramento, its board of supervisors, *844and several school districts, to compel respondent county-assessor to comply with Revenue and Taxation Code section 401, which requires the assessment of all taxable property at an announced fraction of its full cash value. The sole question presented is whether that statute is in conflict with the Constitution. We have concluded that the measure is valid, and hence that a peremptory writ should issue.
As part of an extensive property tax reform in 1966 (Stats. 1966, First Ex. Sess.,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- In Re CreglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- In Re LavineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by146 opinions
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.