Legal Opinion

Leftridge v. City of Sacramento

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1943No. Civ. 6759PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The petitioners have appealed from an order of court discharging the preliminary writ of mandamus which was issued directing the Civil Service Board of the City of Sacramento to hear, determine and report to the city council the prevailing wages which were paid in that vicinity to employees who were engaged in the performance of services similar to those of petitioners who were a garbageman and a collector of refuse from the city streets, and when said prevailing wages had been ascertained that the city should pay petitioners at those rates. After notice and hearing by the civil service…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Walker v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Dyer v. Kazuhisa AbeDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1956
  4. Henry's Restaurants of Pomona, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. State v. PhelpsArizona Supreme Court · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API