Legal Opinion

City of National City v. Fritz

California Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1949No. L. A. 20857PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

The controversy in this proceeding involves the interpretation of a statute authorizing the establishment by municipal corporations of capital outlay funds (Stats. 1937, p. 1995, as amended last in 1945; Stats. 1945, p. 1867).

That act provides that the governing body of any city “empowered to levy and collect assessments or taxes may by ordinance provide for the levy and collection of assessments or taxes for the creation and accumulation of a fund for capital outlays. ’ ’ The general limitation on the right to impose taxes applies. “At any time after the creation of such a fund such…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. City of Whittier v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. City of Madera v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Stillwell v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. CaudilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Southern California Gas Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. City & County of San Francisco v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Marrujo v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. In Re Marriage of BrigdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API