Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County and from an order denying a new trial Ansel Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
This is an action to recover for insurance on the property of plaintiff destroyed by fire. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and plaintiff had judgment, from which and from the order denying motion for a new trial this appeal is prosecuted upon bill of exceptions. The case was once before tried and appealed to this court, and is reported in 98 Cal. 557.
Submitted upon the brief in this case, upon the same record, are also two other cases, to wit: Stockton etc. Works v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., No. 261; Stockton etc. Works v. Hamburg-Magdeburg Fire Ins. Co., No. 259.
Upon…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Stockton Combine Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glen's Falls Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Thompson v. GornerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Bell v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Eversdon v. MayhewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Benson v. ShotwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Goldwater v. OltmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Colbert v. ColbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Moore v. TrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Bollinger v. BollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Antonelle v. Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.