Legal Opinion

Benson v. Shotwell

California Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1894No. 15186PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, and in the opinion reported in 87 Cal. 49.

1Opinion of the Court

„ Van Fleet, J.

This is the second appeal in this case. The first appeal was from a judgment in favor of *165plaintiff, which was reversed, and the cause was remanded for a new trial. (87 Cal. 49.) On the second trial, the plaintiff again recovered judgment, and the defendant appeals from the judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court on the former appeal. On that appeal it was determined, as matter of law, that, by the terms of the contract in question, defendant was entitled to a good paper title of record, and was not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hicks v. LovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Benson v. ShotwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Hartford Fire Insurance v. EnochSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  3. McGovern v. HaysSupreme Court of Vermont · 1902
  4. Tholl v. KolesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. Thoroman v. DavidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API