Moore v. Trott
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Oourt of San Luis Obispo County and from an order refusing a new trial. E. P. Unangst, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is the second appeal. The decision upon the first appeal will be found reported in 156 Cal. 354, [134 Am. St. Rep. 131, 104 Pac. 578], Upon the second trial the court found that the deeds to the land in controversy had been by Patrick Moore delivered to defendant, Mrs. Trott, “between the 1st day of June, 1905, and the date of Patrick Moore’s death, and that when said deeds were delivered as herein found said Patrick Moore parted with all dominion and control over said deeds, and each of them, and with the right to recall or change, or affect the same, or either of said deeds, and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Souverbye v. ArdenNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
- Kenniff v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Hibberd v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Sneed v. OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. ShueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. BarraganCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Decou v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.