Antonelle v. Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. William H. Jordan, for Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Company, Appellant. The consent of J. S. Antonelle was a condition precedent of the liability of the defendant under the contract with plaintiff. (Civ. Code, sec. 1436; Van Horne v. Dorrance, 2 Dall. 304; Fed. Cas. No. 16,857; Northup v. Northup, 6 Conn. 196; Cohey v. Lehman, 79 Ill. 173; Packard v. Van Schoick, 58 Ill. 80; Hambly v. Delaware Ry.
Read the full summary
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. William H. Jordan, for Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Company, Appellant. The consent of J. S. Antonelle was a condition precedent of the liability of the defendant under the contract with plaintiff. (Civ. Code, sec. 1436; Van Horne v. Dorrance, 2 Dall. 304; Fed. Cas. No. 16,857; Northup v. Northup, 6 Conn. 196; Cohey v. Lehman, 79 Ill. 173; Packard v. Van Schoick, 58 Ill. 80; Hambly v. Delaware Ry. Co., 21 Fed. 541; Perryman v. Trustees etc., 14 Bush. 75; Griggs v. Moore, 168 Mass. 354; Cowan v. Phænix Ins. Co., 78 Cal. 181; McLaughlin v. Clausen, 85…
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
In January, 1891, plaintiff was the owner of 'two certificates of deposit aggregating thirty-four thousand dollars, issued by the People’s Home Savings Bank in favor of, and held by, one B. O. Carr. The Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Company, defendant, having brought suit against the firm of Antonelle & Doe, intervener, caused an attachment to issue and levied it upon certain real property of plaintiff, and garnisheed said certificates and the funds represented thereby in the hands of said Carr, on the claim that said land and money were the property of said J. S. Antonelle, husband of said…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Daggett v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Cohen v. KnoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hawley v. . KeelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Deacon v. BlodgetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- American-Hawaiian Engineering & Construction Co. v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Alpha Beta Food Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union Local 770California Supreme Court · 1955
- San Diego Construction Co. v. MannixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Fraley, Adm'r v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.