Legal Opinion

Bollinger v. Bollinger

California Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1908No. S.F. No. 4305PublishedCited by 38 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of tbe Superior Court of Santa. Clara County and from an order denying a new trial. M„. H. Hyland, Judge. .Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion of tbe court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

The following opinion in the above-entitled cause was handed down by the district court of appeal of the first appellate district:

“This action was brought, by plaintiff Mary A. L. Bollinger, to have it decreed that certain property conveyed by the late husband of plaintiff, Christian Bollinger (now deceased) to George Y. Bollinger, without consideration, was community property of plaintiff and her late husband, and that George Y. Bollinger holds one half thereof in trust for plaintiff, etc., etc.
“Plaintiff made not only George Y. Bollinger, who is a son of Christian Bollinger, defendant, but…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. People v. ConklingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. People v. CrespiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. In Re Estate of RelphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Cheney v. City & County of San Francisco Employees Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Fernandez v. AburreaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API