Legal Opinion

Mulcahy v. Mossa

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 17, 2005No. AC 25209PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUPONT, J.

The defendant, Michael Mossa, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his counterclaim against the intervening plaintiff, the state of Connecticut (state). The defendant claims on appeal that the court improperly concluded that the doctrine of sovereign immunity and the two year statute of limitations in General Statutes § 52-584 1 barred his counterclaim. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The following factual and procedural history is relevant to our resolution of the defendant’s claim. On December 26, 2001, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lostritto v. Community Action Agency of New Haven, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. State v. CareySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. State v. CareySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Teresa T. v. RagagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. Neiman v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fine Homebuilders, Inc. v. PerroneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. Worth v. Commissioner of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. Wright v. Teamsters Local 559Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. Council v. HeinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026
  5. Fine Homebuilders, Inc. v. PerroneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API