Legal Opinion
Wright v. Teamsters Local 559
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 3, 2010No. AC 30803PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
The plaintiff, Lloyd Wright, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his complaint against the defendant, Teamsters Local 559, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly dismissed his complaint as time barred by the two year statute of limitations set forth in General Statutes § 46&-102. The plaintiff argues that, because the date of his amended complaint should be the controlling date for determining the applicability of the statute of limitations, his action was timely. Because we conclude that his Superior…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williams v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Caron v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Alswanger v. SmegoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Williams v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Caron v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sempey v. Stamford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Kawecki v. SaasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Kopylec v. TOWN OF NORTH BRANFORDConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Kopylec v. TOWN OF NORTH BRANFORDConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.