Legal Opinion
Lostritto v. Community Action Agency of New Haven, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 18, 2004No. SC 16808PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether General Statutes § 52-102b (a),1 which *13requires service of an apportionment complaint within 120 days after the return date of the original complaint, is mandatory or directory in nature. The defendants, Community Action Agency of New Haven, Inc. (Com*14munity Action), and Elizabeth Barrett, appeal from two judgments of dismissal rendered by the trial court in favor of both sets of apportionment defendants, Neuro-surgical Associates of Connecticut, P.C., and its employee, Harry P. Engel (collectively, Neurosurgical Associates),…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Ecker v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Caulkins v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Grady v. Town of SomersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Teresa T. v. RagagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- D'ERAMO v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. BletschSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Cogswell v. American Transit InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.