Legal Opinion
State v. Carey
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 8, 1994No. 14751PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is the determination of the proper remand when the outcome of a hearing for revocation of probation is tainted by the improper admission of hearsay evidence. Pursuant to a conviction of the defendant, Thurlow Carey, for assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § SSa-Gl,1 he was placed on probation for one year. Within the probationary period, the state sought *489revocation of the defendant’s probation, pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-32,2 because he had allegedly violated a condition of his probation that required him to have no contact…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. JohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. CraftsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State v. SaurisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. MerriamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. CalabreseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.