Legal Opinion

Van Cleave v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 24, 2005No. 03-1765CPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HODGES, Judge.

Plaintiff accepted the terms of his medical discharge from the Navy and waived further review, then appealed to a military records correction board. After the Correction Board denied his application for review, plaintiff sought judicial review in this court. We ruled that plaintiffs waiver was knowing and voluntary. “The administrative record shows that the Navy followed its procedures conscientiously and in good faith____ Mr. Van Cleave’s signature on the form of waiver is conclusive.” Van Cleave v. United States, 60 Fed.Cl. 291, 293 (2004), vacated by 402 F.3d 1341…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  3. Christie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  4. Crispino v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  5. Gant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Van Cleave v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Jeun v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Rominger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Richard P. Watson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API