Legal Opinion
Rominger v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 20, 2006No. 05-742CPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court are cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record pursuant to Rule 52.1 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”)1 in this military disability ease. The plaintiff, Christopher N. Rominger (“Rominger”), was a former Staff Sergeant with the United States Army (“Army”). Mr. Rominger was separated from the Army because of a physical disability on November 29, 1999, after having served for 13 years, 9 months and 9 days. Mr. Rominger received a 20 percent disability rating and severance pay. Shortly after Mr.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Kenneth L. Wronke v. John A. Marsh, as Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Skinner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- De Cicco v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Kirwin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Stine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Santiago v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Rudo v. GerenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Richard P. Watson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Miglionico v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.