Legal Opinion
Stine v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 10, 2010No. 08-63CPublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
Plaintiff Thomas Stine alleges that the United States Navy (“Navy”) wrongfully discharged him and underestimated the extent of his service-related disabilities, and further that the Board for Correction of Naval Records (“BCNR” or “the Board”) acted arbitrarily in denying his application for correction of his naval records. See Compl. ¶ 1 (docket entry 1, Jan. 29, 2009). For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion for judgment on the administrative record is GRANTED.
1. Background2
A. First Naval Service: 1977-1979
Mr. Stine began his naval service…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Captain Ross E. Joslyn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Richard P. Watson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Robert E. Pearl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Blair Coleman v. Frank KendallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.