Legal Opinion

Van Cleave v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 19, 2006No. 03-1765CPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

HODGES, Judge.

Mr. Van Cleave was separated from the Navy in July 1997 with a ten percent disability rating for migraine headaches and $46,720.80 in severance pay. Plaintiff sought an adjustment from the Board for Correction of Naval Records in August 1999 to reflect a disability rating of at least thirty percent. The adjustment would have placed plaintiff on the permanent disability retirement list and entitled him to disability retirement pay.

The BCNR denied plaintiffs application for relief. The Board’s rationale for denial was arbitrary and capricious, and its ruling on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Kalvar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. Skinner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. David C. Roth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Stine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Martinez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Verbeck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Banerjee v. StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. Boyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API