Christie v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtKuNzig, Judge
In this civilian employment action, the court is confronted with a single legal question: whether plaintiff was wrong*336fully separated from government service, by means of a coerced resignation. We hold that, as a matter of law, plaintiff’s resignation was voluntary.
The factual setting in which this case arises may be briefly summarized as follows: Plaintiff, a '5-point veteran’s preference employee, had continuously served in the Navy Department since 1943. From 1943 until August 1946, plaintiff was on active duty in the United States Naval reserve. At the end of World War II, she was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fruhauf Southwest Garment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- James E. Haynes v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Patrick F. X. McGucken v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by187 opinions
- Elias Covington v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Garcia v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- David E. Tippett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Margaret J. Schultz v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Richard J. Griessenauer v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.