Legal Opinion

Gant v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 20, 2004No. 03-1911CPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHRISTINE ODELL COOK MILLER, Judge.

Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss a pro se plaintiffs complaint seeking *312relief for a variety of wrongs allegedly committed by the military up to, during, and after an honorable discharge on disability from the United States Navy. Among the numerous descriptive paragraphs of grievances that the Court of Federal Claims does not have jurisdiction to consider is a claim entitled “wrongful discharge.” Defendant seeks dismissal of plaintiffs claim on the merits, pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(6), arguing that plaintiff is bound to the disability…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Woodson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Stine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Hernandez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Jeun v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Chisolm v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API