Wreggitt v. Porterfield
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.
Plaintiff Wreggitt and the defendants Porterfield own adjoining properties on the south side of Third avenue, in the city of Spokane. The parties agreed by stipulation, in the trial court, that, as of August, 1898, there was unity of title to both parcels in the Northwestern and Pacific Hypotheekbank. In 1897, a sewer permit had issued to the bank for the purpose of a connection from the city sewer on Third avenue to a house on the lot that is now owned by the defendants. No mention was made of the house now owned by the plaintiff. In May, 1908, the parents of the defendants acquired title to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wiesel v. SmiraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1928
- Evich v. KovacevichWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Berlin v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Rogers v. CationWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Schumacher v. BrandWashington Supreme Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dressler v. IsaacsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Adams v. CullenWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Bullis v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Neary v. MartinHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- Silver v. StrohmWashington Supreme Court · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.