Legal Opinion

Berlin v. Robbins

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1934No. 25194. Department OnePublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

This action was brought to quiet title in plaintiff Berlin to an easement to maintain water pipes across the defendant’s land and to withdraw water from a spring thereon to supply the plaintiff’s property, and to enjoin the defendant from interfering with the pipes or the flow of the water from the spring. Trial of the cause to the court resulted in judgment granting relief according to the prayer of the complaint. The cause is before us on appeal from that judgment.

As plaintiff Makiyama is a tenant, owner Berlin will be designated respondent. As Hazel T. Bobbins is the sole owner of the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lampman v. . MilksNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Buss v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  4. Ellis v. BassettIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Wiesel v. SmiraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1928

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. McKeon v. BrammerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Olson v. MullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Evich v. KovacevichWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Hellberg v. Coffin Sheep Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Romanchuk v. PlotkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API