Adams v. Cullen
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
— Can an easement by implication be created by implied reservation?
This is an appeal from a judgment declaring that respondents have an easement for ingress and egress across the land of appellants. The judgment orders appellants to remove certain obstructions from the right of way.
Appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Adams, are the owners of the servient estate. Mr. and Mrs. Cullen, the respondents, own the dominant estate. For brevity, we will only refer to Mr. Adams and Mr. Cullen. We use the terms “dominant estate” and “servient estate” to refer to the properties for the purpose of clarity, fully…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dale v. BedalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Evich v. KovacevichWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Berlin v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Bailey v. HennesseyWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Rogers v. CationWashington Supreme Court · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hellberg v. Coffin Sheep Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
- King County v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Landberg v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Landberg v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Puget Sound Mutual Savings Bank v. LillionsWashington Supreme Court · 1957
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.