Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Cation

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1941No. 27908PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Driver, J. —

Plaintiffs brought this action to quiet title to an easement to use, on their own land, the waters of a spring arising on the premises of the defendants and to enjoin the latter from interfering with such easement. A trial to the court resulted in a decree in favor of the plaintiffs, and the defendants Everell L. Cation and Olive Ella Cornwell appealed. Pursuant to a stipulation of the parties, the action has been abated as to respondent V. H. Rogers, and Mary Fowler Rogers is now the only respondent.

A shallow valley runs from east to west across the farm lands involved in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ellis v. BassettIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Peoples Savings Bank v. Frank BuffordWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Skansi v. NovakWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Berlin v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Bailey v. HennesseyWashington Supreme Court · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Northwest Cities Gas Co. v. Western Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Diel v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  3. Evich v. KovacevichWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Hellberg v. Coffin Sheep Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Adams v. CullenWashington Supreme Court · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API