Legal Opinion

Silver v. Strohm

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1951No. 31554PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

This action was instituted by the appellant against respondents and several other defendants to enjoin them from obstructing and preventing his use of a strip of land for road purposes. The defendants other than respondents did not appear. The court made findings of fact and entered a judgment denying an injunction. The court refused to award appellant a right of way over a 15-foot strip of land adjacent to the west side of respondent’s property.' The respondents will be referred to in the singular.

The theory upon which the action was brought and maintained was that the common grantor, W. T.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Evich v. KovacevichWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Berlin v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Bailey v. HennesseyWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Rogers v. CationWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Roe v. WalshWashington Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holt v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  2. MacMeekin v. Low Income Housing Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. Freightways Terminal Co. v. Industrial & Commercial Construction, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Robert Boyd Et Al., Appellants, v. Sunflower Properties LLC, RespondentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. MacMeekin v. LihiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API