Bullis v. Schmidt
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
The plaintiffs ground their cause of action for breach of the covenant against incumbrances upon the alleged existence of an implied easement, to maintain the underground sewer and water pipes across the plaintiffs’ premises, which easement runs for the benefit of the adjoining property to the east.
The subject of implied easements is well discussed in 2 American Law of Property, pp. 255-263, secs. 8.31-8.43; 1 Thompson, Real Property (perm, ed.), pp. 630-674, secs. 390-411; and Anno. 58 A. L. R. 824. The last-mentioned annotation is limited specifically to implied easements with respect to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wells v. . GarbuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Wiesel v. SmiraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1928
- Oldfield v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Miller v. HoeschlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Christensen v. MannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fuller v. DrenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Matter of LampertUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1986
- Schwab v. TimmonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Bino v. City of HurleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Sicchio v. AlveyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.