Schumacher v. Brand
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Yakima county, Grady, J., entered February 20, 1912, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for an injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
The plaintiffs seek to enjoin the defendants from obstructing or otherwise interfering with an alleged waste ditch across the land of the latter. The plaintiffs base their claim upon the ground of an implied easement. The court adjudged that the plaintiffs had an easement or right of way for the waste ditch across the defendants’1 premises, entering on the north side thereof, at a point “about 90 feet *544east of the northwest corner thereof, and running thence southwesterly across said defendants’ premises, and leaving the same at a point about 90 feet south of the said northwest corner…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Powers v. HeffernanIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- German Savings & Loan Society v. GordonOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Silva v. HawnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
3Cited by14 opinions
- Adams v. CullenWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Bailey v. HennesseyWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Stephens Ranch & Live Stock Co. v. Union Pac. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1916
- Barnhart v. Gold Run, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Venegas v. LubyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.