Legal Opinion

State v. Dillon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1981No. TC 10-80-01096, CA 18267, SC 27827PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

In this case, State v. Eastman/Kovach, 292 Or 184, 637 P2d 609 (1981), and State v. Tuma, 292 Or 194, 637 P2d 614 (1981) (decided this date), we examine the nature and scope of restitution as authorized for criminal sentences by ORS 137.103 to 137.109. Each case presents different aspects of restitution.

THE FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Here, defendant refused to stop his car when signalled to do so by a Springfield police officer. A 60-mile high-speed chase ensued. Eventually, defendant’s car was boxed in by three police cars. Defendant refused an officer’s order to get out of his car. Instead,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. StalheimOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. EastmanOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. TumaOregon Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. State v. LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  2. State v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. BarkleyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. EdsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. HvalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API