Legal Opinion

State v. Tupa

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 2005No. 20040106, 20040132PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Mark Tupa and Brandon Kok appealed from restitution orders that directed them each to pay $12,000 in victim compensation stemming from their pleading guilty to felony criminal mischief. Both appeals raise identical issues, whether the trial court abused its discretion in determining the amount of restitution or the defendants’ ability to pay restitution. We affirm the restitution orders.

[¶ 2] Tupa and Kok pleaded guilty to felony criminal mischief resulting from their role in the destruction of a rural farmstead owned by Terence Schmidt and the Schmidt family.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. HawthorneSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. City of Jamestown v. Leevers Supermarkets, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. ThorstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. City of Devils Lake v. DavisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. KosteleckyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. RogersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. MoosNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. JacobsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Landers v. BiwerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API