Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Federated Fruit & Vegetable Growers, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 23, 1930No. Docket No. 115PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARMER, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs. The action arose out of an oral contract for the sale of grapes. Plaintiffs are growers and shippers of grapes. Frank Elliott, one of the plaintiffs and respondents, made the contract in question on behalf of the respondents. Plaintiffs and respondents operated a packinghouse at Cutler, Tulare County, Fresno district, during the summer of 1927. Appellant and defendant is a large corporation marketing fruit and vegetables and it maintains offices in many of the large cities of the country, its western office being in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. McCollum v. BarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  3. Craig v. SheaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Elliott v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Young v. TassopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Cory v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Arneson v. WebsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API