Young v. Tassop
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, J. pro tem.
The plaintiff sued to recover damages for personal injuries resulting to her from a collision between herself and an automobile driven by the defendant Tassop, for whose acts in that respect the other defendant, it is conceded, was legally responsible. The case was tried by a jury and judgment in favor of plaintiff was entered on their verdict, from which both defendants appeal.
Some of the facts are not in dispute; regarding others there was much conflict in the evidence. Taking the view of the evidence most favorable to the judgment, as we must on appeal, we find it…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- White v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Rolland v. PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Lowell v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kirk v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Moran v. GatzIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
- Taha v. FinegoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Isaacs v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Trennert v. CoeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.