Legal Opinion
County of Santa Cruz v. City of Watsonville
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 23, 1985No. A024880PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AGLIANO, J.
Introduction
The instant action involves interpretation of the scope of the Westside Industrial Redevelopment Plan which was drafted and implemented by defendants City of Watsonville (City) and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Watsonville (Agency) in 1973. Nine years after the Plan was adopted, plaintiff County of Santa Cruz (County) filed a complaint seeking, inter alia, a declaration that the redevelopment plan is limited to a single project for the construction of a fire access road known as the Ford Street Extension Project. The City and the Agency object, claiming…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- City of Fairfield v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Bravo Vending v. City of Rancho MirageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Friends of Mammoth v. Town of Mammoth Lakes Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Sosa v. City of Corpus Christi, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
- Redevelopment Agency v. Rados Bros.California Court of Appeal · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.