Friends of Mammoth v. Town of Mammoth Lakes Redevelopment Agency
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, J.
In this consolidated appeal, we address challenges to a redevelopment plan adopted by the Town of Mammoth Lakes and the environmental analysis performed on that plan. The trial court determined both the environmental analysis and the redevelopment plan complied with governing law. We disagree, and reverse both the trial court’s judgment upholding the environmental analysis and the trial court’s judgment on the validity of the redevelopment plan. Our decision also nullifies the trial court’s denial of motions to tax costs in the two actions below.
Facts
In March of 1996,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. San Mateo County Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Banker's Hill, Hillcrest, Park West Community Preservation Group v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Citizens for a Sustainable Treasure Island v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- City of Arcadia v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.