Legal Opinion

Bravo Vending v. City of Rancho Mirage

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 1993No. E009290PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

Appellant Bravo Vending (Bravo) appeals from a judgment against it on its action for declaratory relief and a permanent injunction and its petition for a writ of mandate, both of which sought to prevent the enforcement of an ordinance adopted by the City of Rancho Mirage (City). We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

On December 6, 1990, the City adopted its Ordinance No. 488, which: forbade the retail sale of “any cigarette or any tobacco product or cigarette paper or cigarette wrapper[ 1 ] at any place in the City without a license”; established an annual license…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Laird v. BlackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Stop Youth Addiction, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. California Grocers Assn. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Association of Irritated Residents v. Department of ConservationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Gibson v. World Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Murray v. Oceanside Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API