Board of Public Service Commissioners v. Spear
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
The only question raised upon this appeal is whether or not the trial court had discretion under the facts presented to render a judgment against a tenant holding over for rental only, without trebling the amount. Respondent purchased certain premises of which appellant held possession under a verbal agreement which respondent alleged was a tenancy from month to month, and served upon him a thirty-day notice to vacate; upon his failure to do so, it served the statutory three-day notice, and subsequently brought this action for possession of the premises and treble rents. Appellant’s answer…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Alden v. MayfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Vatuone v. CannobioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
3Cited by3 opinions
- Richard v. Degen & Brody, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Gwinn v. GoldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Field v. WaltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928