Legal Opinion

Board of Public Service Commissioners v. Spear

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 1924No. Civ. No. 4465PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The only question raised upon this appeal is whether or not the trial court had discretion under the facts presented to render a judgment against a tenant holding over for rental only, without trebling the amount. Respondent purchased certain premises of which appellant held possession under a verbal agreement which respondent alleged was a tenancy from month to month, and served upon him a thirty-day notice to vacate; upon his failure to do so, it served the statutory three-day notice, and subsequently brought this action for possession of the premises and treble rents. Appellant’s answer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Alden v. MayfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Vatuone v. CannobioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richard v. Degen & Brody, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Gwinn v. GoldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Field v. WaltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API