Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Taaffe

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1866PublishedCited by 176 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Fifteenth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The plaintiff appealed from an order of the Court below, setting aside a default. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Sanderson, J.

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a judgment by default. It is claimed by appellant that the affidavit upon which the order was made is fatally deficient in the two essential particulars of excuse and merits. We are of the opinion that both points are well made.

An affidavit on motion to vacate a judgment under the sixty-eighth section of the Practice Act must show—First, that the default occurred through mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect; and second, that the defendant has a meritorious defense to the action. If the affidavit is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roland v. KreyenhagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Haight v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Hunt v. WallisNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  4. Woodward v. BackusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  5. People v. O'ConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by176 opinions

  1. Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. DurhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. People v. RusselCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API