Richard v. Degen & Brody, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
Unlawful detainer action. Plaintiff recovered judgment and defendants appeal; plaintiff also appeals.
Plaintiff acquired the property from Robert Lee Myer through an escrow which was opened on May 8, 1958, and closed on June 30, 1958. The premises were under lease to defendant Degen and Brody, Incorporated, the term having some two years to run. That lease forbade assignment or subleasing by the lessee without written consent of the lessor, and provided that "[a] ny such assignment or subletting without such consent shall be void, and shall, at the option of lessor, terminate this lease. ’ ’…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- New v. NewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Connell v. BowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bisno v. SaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Swasey v. AdairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Nwosu v. UbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- C & K ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS v. Amber Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Raedeke v. Gibraltar Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.