Alden v. Mayfield
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Solano County, and from an order denying a new trial. A. J. Buckles and W. T. O’Donnell, Judges. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was brought to recover possession of certain real property in Suisun, Solano County, for rents due up to the timé of the termination of the tenancy, and for treble costs for the period subsequent to that date. At the first trial judgment was rendered for defendant, from which an appeal to the supreme court was taken and a reversal had. (Alden v. Mayfield, 164 Cal. 6, [127 Pac. 45].) The new trial resulted in a judgment “that said plaintiff have and recover from said defendant the sum of six hundred and fifty dollars with interest thereon from the first day of April, 1911, . . . and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Sioux City Stock Yards Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1908
- Barnes v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- Alden v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Stewart v. SeftonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Chipman v. EmericCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
3Cited by11 opinions
- Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Russ-Field Corp. v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Gwinn v. GoldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Forthmann v. MyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Goodhew v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.